Informed
|
Myth of The Judiciary |
|
Why the common misconception about the Judicial Branch as a lawmaking branch of government? Because; the Judicial Branch can limit the enforcement of laws that originate from the other legislative or executive branch, It gives the appearance they are making law. The laws of these branches are subject to overrule by Judicial Branch ONLY if they exceed the authority Granted to them by the Constitution thus imposing a limitation on the power of the either the Legislative Branch or the Executive Branch, as subgroups of the collective, to usurp the sovereignty of the individual.
|
Judicial Branch has no authority to “make” laws. Only authority of Judiciary in regard to laws is to limit enforcement of Laws of other branches if they are Unconstitutional. That is; if they exceed the limits of the Constitution. The Courts have a duty to order the equitable enforcement of laws they do not agree with. The Courts of the Judicial Branch have discretion to establish policy or procedure, the mechanics, of the Court for Just and Quick settlement of disputes among parties who accuse each other of violating the law. Their Policy making authority, the procedures the courts use, are subject to limitation by The Constitution, by Statutory Law from the Legislative Branch, and removal of Judges from office by the Legislative & Executive Branch or by the people as the ultimate sovereigns. |
||||
|
|||||
| The Courts have chosen to
violate their duty by agreeing among each other to establish Policy known
as "stare decisis" which they now treat as "Law" above
the Constitution in violation of the
Supremacy of the Constitution.
The Courts refuse to enforce some laws against the wealthy or connected while, at the same time, refuse to recognize others, including Constitutional Rights, of groups of select identification and Individuals who do not have wealth or political power. The members of the judiciary have agreed among themselves to create and follow policy designed to create procedural hurdles they may use to frustrate the majority of individuals who try to enforce their right to the protection of the Law. The very reason for granting a Federal Judge an appointment for life was to insulate these Judges from any dictates to rule in anyway contrary to the Constitution - Their duty is to follow the Constitution and not the dictates of other Judges or other branches of the government. They can be removed from office only for violation of their Oath to be bound to the Constitution. They should be and this is an issue we the people must now address. It is a treasonous fraud that has become so accepted this nation no longer bothers with Constitutional Amendments as all Judges simply follows the dictates of the higher Courts in replacing all human rights with a forced enslavement to those with title, power, and money in denial of equality resulting in imposition of injustice upon us all! They have made themselves an Oligarchy that is above the law and Rule like Kings with discretion to grant titles of nobility on people of wealth and position! They have made government clerks overseers for those they titled as Noble Slave Masters. Dereliction of Duty by the Courts has always existed to some degree. Slavery was never "legal" under the United States Constitution. But the Constitutional Prohibition against slavery was not enforced until the leadership of Lincoln. Enforcement of Federal Law that was unpopular in the Southern States was the cause of the Civil War. Beginning in the 1970's, a new Elitism took over the Supreme Court and the usurpation, the taking, of power away from the people has been accelerating every since. It will, ultimately, lead to our nation's destruction. It is the root cause for the breakdown of law and order, anarchy, and injustice we see today most evident in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. |
|||||
