Too Many Judges have
used the word "interpretation"
as an excuse to circumvent the
RULE OF LAW
In America Law is nothing but written words of
common meaning that all can understand. They are words that if not enforced
mean nothing. Law is not a person of title. Law is not a cop,
a government agency, a Judge or even a panel of Judges.
THE LAW IS
THE WRITTEN WORD
Anything else is arbitrary and
discriminatory.
Anything else is contrary to the first premise of our Constitution
and the very foundation of our Nation.
The Mandated (required)
Decision Making Process
of a Judge
Our Constitution establishes a very simply decision
making process for the Judges of this Nation and of the States that make up
this nation. The Supreme Law of the Land requires them to apply the law in
accordance with this process. Anything else is a sign of arrogance by which
they placed their self above the law, ignorance,
incompetence or corruption. It can be deemed treason.
The decision process is taught to all in high school
but quickly forgotten by most and routinely and deliberately ignored by
those we have trusted with a sacred duty and solemn trust. It is routinely
downplayed, countered, and even discredited in our media in the promotion of
the agenda of special interests.
The decision making process of applying the Law is
simply a matter of recognizing and giving honor to the hierarchy of laws. It
goes as follows:
First: What does the Constitution say regarding
this matter? What are the required procedures established by the
Constitution? What are the RIGHTS of the individuals involved? Note:
Entities, such as any organization like a business or government agency HAVE
NO RIGHTS. Note: Titles have no rights. A person who has been given a title
has been given responsibilities. It is NOT a grant of superior rights over
others. ONLY INDIVIDUALS HAVE RIGHTS!
Second: What does the State Constitution say?
What are the required procedures established by this State’s
Constitution? What are the RIGHTS of the individuals involved under this
State’s Constitution? Do they conflict with the U.S. Constitution? If so
then follow the dictates of the U.S. constitution.
Third: What do Federal Statutes say regarding this
matter?
If it conflicts with the U.S. Constitution then disregard it and go with
the plain words of the Constitution. Does it infringe on the Rights of the
individual established by the State Constitution? If so then declare it,
too, unconstitutional.
Fourth: Look at what the State Statutes say
applying the same hierarchy in determining if they statute is Constitution
and the proper procedure for it’s application.
The same procedure is used with lesser laws be they
laws created by Federal Agencies, State Agencies, Counties or Cities.
The last part of the decision making process
is to look to Court Rules of Procedure as a Policy that the Court may
REQUEST the parties follow and sanction the parties if the do not follow
the procedures of the Court. RULES OF THE COURT ARE NOT LAW! They are
procedural policies for which a party to a litigation can be held in
contempt and punished by fine. We object to jailing people for contempt. It
is abusive.
Guides: The Courts then may look to stare
decisis, that is precedent set by other courts in similar cases and
circumstances, for guidance in making their ruling. NOTE: Stare Decisis is
NOT Law. It is merely a source of reference and a guide.
