George wrote
In my frequently blunt way, I got the groups
attention and
stated that the question of government jurisdiction had been
settled at Waco in 1993 and no one had challenged them
sufficiently since then to change things. The government has
jurisdiction because they got more guns and will use them
with impunity (so far). That question is settled.
With that said, my comment on this guys article is that I
agree with him to about 95% of what he said.
George
Absolutely right George. I do not know why it is
so very difficult to get people to understand what you succinctly illustrate.
I guess it is a refusal to accept harsh reality.
People can say "I have rights", they can wave
around a piece of paper showing their rights. They can say they are free. They
can wave around a piece of paper that says they are free. They can say a
judgment against them is void. But can they stop a void judgment from being
enforced?
But they have no rights in fact if those rights
cannot be enforced.
They are not free if they have no protection while
doing that which a piece of paper says they are free to do.
The Constitution, the Law, the Bible can have
words that say "you can do this, or you can do that" "you are free to do this,
you are free to do that" "the law protects you from this or that", "god
protects you from this or that". Do they? Words are meaningless if not
enforced.
As it is now; anyone clothed with a semblance of
the color of law is free to disregard any and all rights of any of us anytime
they want with complete impunity. They can deny us any and all of our personal
freedom anytime they want with or without legal authority. Their "title" gives
them that as a right they have because we have allowed it. Judges rarely
enforce any of our rights and, when they do, it is very selectively. They
protect unwritten "rights" of government authorities and the powerful. Judges
have granted themselves absolute, arbitrary, despotic power. They have passed
that on to our President and right on down to a part-time deputy constable or
prison guard. That is the reality. The rest is just hot air.
The very purpose for the creation of law is for
our protection. But it was not long before it became a tool used to deny us
protection.
THEY HAVE USED THE LAW TO RULE - IN THE PROCESS
THEY HAVE DENIED US THE RULE OF LAW
It is time we enforced our Right to Rule them and
make OUR law enforceable.