If a government operating on our Land of Texas can deny restitution for your property, when it has admitted to unlawfully taking it, including by damage and destruction; then we have:
In our Land known as Texas. Our government presently claims immunity for it's unlawful takings. YOU MAY BE NEXT |
The Spirit of the Law is Protection from the Government The Intent for Constitutions and Laws is to protect you from the King, or the State, or government by whatever name it is known. If there is no Restitution, then there is no Protection. The Law becomes a false promise, a suggestion that may be disregarded by government (aka, the King / the State) |
LIBERTY: The Right of the Individual to have Law protect them, and their property, from the government (the State). JUSTICE: The Right to Restitution for loss from unlawful acts. Includes the unintentional by government (the State). PRIVATE PROPERTY: The right to have property protected from the government (The State). Even communist nations prosecute citizens for taking property from a fellow citizen. What protects property from theft by The State? HELP PRESERVE THESE |
LIBERTY JUSTICE PRIVATE PROPERTY |
CAPITALISM vs. COMMUNISM The difference has nothing to do with protecting private property from theft by another person. It's a question of whether or not private property is protected from theft by The State (aka, government). The Right to Private Property exist when Private Property is protected not just by, but FROM, The State. |
LIBERTY JUSTICE PRIVATE PROPERTY |